single shakes

Customer Health Rating:

Special K Review – Does This Product Really Work?

What is Special K?

This nationwide brand produces protein shakes and even morning shakes in various different flavors in ready made liquid bottles. They’re meant to satisfy hunger and can be drank at all times of the day for a quick hunger satisfying shake.

Mentions of it being a meal replacement are not offered however. What it claims to provide is a good source of fiber and protein that can help supplement a healthy diet regimen.

Let’s see what other tidbits are to be found within.

Who makes it?

Kellogg an American company makes this alongside several other brands and they’ve been operating since 1906.

shakeTheir breakfast cereal came under fire by the FTC for making false claims of its health properties. They’ve also served 2 major recalls, once for over 28 million of their products being contaminated which led to nausea and vomiting in consumers. Another recall came after notice of metal fragments in their breakfast cereal.

How (and) does it work?

There are breakfast options as well as regular protein shakes offered. However the nutritional profile and ingredient listing is virtually identical beyond just 10 calories different depending on the flavor. It’s unclear what separated one from the other at all.

In fact the product does not really distinguish itself in any grand way. Other than claiming to provide a good source of protein and fiber, the details are skimmed over.

The main ingredients are water, a protein blend, a thickener and sugar. The rest of the vitamins come in sparing amounts. 5 grams of fiber are added which are good for helping relieve hunger. Meanwhile 10 grams of protein are added alongside 18 grams of sugar. This is a significant amount not found in even the most sugar laden protein shakes.

Sugar does not help in weight loss and at the rate of 18 grams it can increase hunger.

What’s inside of it and are there side effects?

Not only is there GMO soy present but a huge amount of sugar added. Top shelf meal replacements are mentioned in the top 10 list that are not laden with huge amounts of sugar.

  • Polydextrose: This form of sugar fiber is added to substitute more costly alternatives.
  • Maltodextrin: This sugar is added in order to thicken sorrounding ingredients.
  • Artificial Flavors: A chemically created ingredient intended to copy and substitute other natural flavors.
  • Yellow #5: A common food coloring that may potentially cause hyperactivity and allergic reactions in some.
  • Sucralose: A form of calorie free sweetener that is cheap to make and digested quickly in the body.

Potential Side Effects: Diarrhea, headaches, nausea, vomiting, bloating, stomach cramps, rash, hyperactivity, gas, and frequent bathroom trips.

What’s good about it?

Their website has a way to find the nearest locations where this product is stored. It’s unlikely one would need it though since these products are in abundance in many stores across the US. Also there are several different flavor options assuring one will not be bored.

What’s bad about it?

proteinNo distinction is made at all between their products in terms of their 2 different brands for the morning or overall use.

Also this product neglects to add how their product is better than any other as it gives just vague explanations of it having fiber and protein. This protein does have GMO soy which has been outlined by many as being an inferior choice for protein.

Another issue is how they fail to add a valuable choice of sugar. Of course a product is best if it is lightly sweetened in order to satisfy cravings. It’s still hard to justify 18 grams when most meal replacements have less than half that.

The company doesn’t go into any detail as to how their products work or even an explanation as to their ingredients.

Wrap Up

This brand has a lot of popularity due to their marketing campaigns and wide availability. In fact the company has been around for over 100 years so surely they know a thing or two about staying relevant. What makes this a tough sell however is that the protein source is a bit weak and of course the GMO soy is also a deterrent.

Another unsolved issue is the matter dealing with the high rate of sugar. It’s not often a protein shake will have this much sugar which of course is not ideal for those attempting to lose weight.

  • Effectiveness62%3.1/5
  • Consumer reviews58%2.9/5
  • Quality of ingredients62%3.1/5
  • Cost70%3.5/5
  • Money Back68%3.4/5
  • Overall Rating64%3.2/5
Bottom Line:

Considering just how wide-standing this product keeps its marketing is no small feat. However in the search for proper meal replacement options there are far better suited products that intend to help you lose weight properly.

Taking into account just how lacking this product is in overall nutrition is an issue that now has a solution. You’re capable of enjoying the top 10 list which showcases the best in meal replacement.

Please Share:

Top Rated Diet Shakes of 2024

  • 18shake4.9/5 stars-icon
  • Effectiveness98%
  • Consumer reviews95%
  • Quality of ingredients96%
  • Cost91%
  • Money Back93%
  • Overall Rating95%
  • Vega One shake4.7/5 stars-icon
  • Effectiveness88%
  • Consumer reviews79%
  • Quality of ingredients85%
  • Cost87%
  • Money Back91%
  • Overall Rating86%
  • Yoli shake4.6/5 stars-icon
  • Effectiveness84%
  • Consumer reviews80%
  • Quality of ingredients89%
  • Cost73%
  • Money Back89%
  • Overall Rating83%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2024 CustomerHealthGuide

Disclaimer: Information on this website is intended for your general knowledge only. It is not for professional medical advice or treatment. Always seek the advice of doctor with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Text on this website is not intended to treat, cure or diagnose any disease. All trademarks and products mentioned on this website are the property of their owners.

Advertising Disclosure

All information made public is offered by businesses given compensation. This can alter the appearance of content. The table fails to cite all the available products but efforts will be made to be fully transparent. No matter the affiliation or sponsorship, all displayed content is offered without prejudice.